<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;It is a vicious paper&#8230;&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.randhobart.org.uk/2009/03/18/it-is-a-vicious-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.randhobart.org.uk/2009/03/18/it-is-a-vicious-paper/</link>
	<description>Between outraged ranting and mediocre mundanity is the time I&#039;m allowed...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paying for it &#171; Paperhouse</title>
		<link>http://blog.randhobart.org.uk/2009/03/18/it-is-a-vicious-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Paying for it &#171; Paperhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.randhobart.org.uk/?p=2605#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] Paying for&#160;it 2009 March 31   tags: Jacquie Smith, journalism, media, MP&#039;s expenses, newspapers, Online, pornography by Sarah   The headlines and comment pages are still full of Mr Smith&#8217;s misjudged evening in. If it was purely outrage over a public servant playing the expenses system, then Jacqui Smith&#8217;s demise should have been confirmed by the second home. But the home secretary&#8217;s husband expensed porn, and porn is embarrassing and discrediting. When we&#8217;re watching the headlines rather than writing them, it&#8217;s always fun to point to the other business interests of the Express&#8217;s parent company. &#8220;Dirty Desmond floated up to his current ‘status’ on a sea of pornographic effluent&#8221;, says this blogger. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paying for&nbsp;it 2009 March 31   tags: Jacquie Smith, journalism, media, MP&#8217;s expenses, newspapers, Online, pornography by Sarah   The headlines and comment pages are still full of Mr Smith&#8217;s misjudged evening in. If it was purely outrage over a public servant playing the expenses system, then Jacqui Smith&#8217;s demise should have been confirmed by the second home. But the home secretary&#8217;s husband expensed porn, and porn is embarrassing and discrediting. When we&#8217;re watching the headlines rather than writing them, it&#8217;s always fun to point to the other business interests of the Express&#8217;s parent company. &#8220;Dirty Desmond floated up to his current ‘status’ on a sea of pornographic effluent&#8221;, says this blogger. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
